Future U Podcast - The Pulse of Higher Ed

We’ve been wondering how prison education programs have grown since the reinstatement of Pell grants for incarcerated learners a couple of years ago. So we sent our producer Jeff Young to learn more. It turns out colleges wanting to set up programs face complicated logistics and cultural challenges. To help, several states have recently set up statewide consortiums to help. On this episode we hear from the director of a new program in Minnesota building a playbook for colleges hoping to serve incarcerated students. This episode is made with support from Ascendium Education Group.

Chapters

0:00 - Intro

2:06 - A New Statewide Coalition

3:08 - How Financial Aid Rules Changed In 2023

5:27 - Prison Education Programs Need a Range of Resources

6:40 - Have College Prison Programs Expanded In Recent Years?

7:28 - Colleges Don’t Know Where to Start With Prison Programs

8:32 - What Is the Model for Minnesota’s New Prison Education Consortium?

10:40 - What Professors Need to Know About Teaching in Prison

12:24 - A Guidebook for Prison Education Programs

13:50 - A Student’s Perspective on Higher Ed in Prison

20:40 - The Importance of Learning While in Prison

23:15 - How a Prison Program Changed a Student’s Outlook

24:48 - A Student’s Advice for Professors Teaching in Prison

26:05 - Sponsor Break

26:24 - Online v. In-Person Prison Education Programs

29:29 - When Students Take Ownership of Prison Education Programs

32:17 - Cultural Factors of Setting Up Programs in Prison

33:47 - Technology Needed for Prison Education Programs

35:55 - A Student’s Perspective on Edtech in Prison

39:42 - What’s the Policy Outlook for Prison Education?

41:52 - An Argument for Non-Credit Programs in Prisons

44:51 - What’s the Future for Prison Education?

48:46 - Improving Re-entry Support

Relevant Links

“Reinstating Pell Grants in Prisons Moves Slowly After 26-Year Ban,” in Inside Higher Ed.

“State Coalitions Emerge as Key Infrastructure for Higher Education in Prison,” in Open Campus.

“Advancing Opportunities for Higher Learning: An Evaluation of Minnesota's New Higher Education in Prison Programs,” by the U of Minnesota’s Center for Urban & Regional Affairs.

Check out our previous episodes on the topic: “‘College Unbound’ from the Traditional Model” from 2024 and “College in Prison” from 2022.

Connect with Michael Horn:

Sign Up for the The Future of Education Newsletter

Website

LinkedIn

X (Twitter)

Threads  

Connect with Jeff Selingo:

Dream School: Finding the College That's Right for You

Sign Up for the Next Newsletter

Website

X (Twitter)

Threads

LinkedIn

Connect with Future U:

Twitter

YouTube

Threads

Instagram

Facebook

LinkedIn  

Submit a question and if we answer it on air we'll send you Future U. swag!

Sign up for Future U. emails to get special updates and behind-the-scenes content.

It’s a time of change in higher education. Jeff and Michael look back on what they learned over the course of this ninth season of Future U in a one-on-one discussion. They recap key moments and share their favorite episodes. And one theme keeps emerging: “it’s all about institutional mission.”

Chapters

0:00 - Intro

1:08 - Many of Today’s Challenges Were Predicted 10 Years Ago

3:51 - Why Mission Is Key

4:56 - A ‘Ghost Town Campus’

12:35 - Big Deficits at Colleges

13:47 - The Fire Sale on MBAs

17:05 - How to Restore Trust in Higher Ed

19:17 - The Many Software Vulnerabilities for Colleges

24:29 - How to Design the AI University

26:52 - Jeff’s Favorite Episode of Season 9

30:58 - Michael’s Favorite Episode of Season 9

33:11 - Thanks to the Podcast Team

Relevant Links:

“Season 9 Annual Listener Survey” - Help us prepare for next season

“2026: The seismic shifts for transforming the future of higher education,” by Jeff Selingo, in The Chronicle of Higher Education

“Sonoma State University is in crisis. Can a new president save it,” in The San Francisco Chronicle.

“What happens when students let an economist pick their college?,” in Marketplace. 

“Harvard’s FAS Is Running a $365 Million Structural Deficit. The Problems Started Well Before Trump,” in The Harvard Crimson.

“There is a Fire Sale on MBAs,” in The Wall Street Journal.

“Report of the Committee on Trust in Higher Education,” by Yale University.

“Designing the AI University,” by Jeff Selingo.

“Leading Faculty in an AI Era,” by Jeff Selingo.

"The Lie at the Center of Higher Education," by Melik Peter Khoury.

Connect with Michael Horn:

Sign Up for the The Future of Education Newsletter

Website

LinkedIn

X (Twitter)

Threads  

Connect with Jeff Selingo:

Dream School: Finding the College That's Right for You

Sign Up for the Next Newsletter

Website

X (Twitter)

Threads

LinkedIn

Connect with Future U:

Twitter

YouTube

Threads

Instagram

Facebook

LinkedIn  

Submit a question and if we answer it on air we'll send you Future U. swag!

Sign up for Future U. emails to get special updates and behind-the-scenes content.

The college athletics arms race has created a complex financing puzzle for many institutions. That has led athletics departments to become a kind of ‘shadow university’ within their campuses, with their own systems and processes. And university leaders need to pay closer attention. For this episode, Jeff and Michael talk with Karen Weaver, an expert on the finances behind college athletics. Do colleges need a whole new board structure for sports?

Chapters

0:00 - Introduction

1:35 - Why All College Leaders Should Care About College Athletics

4:14 - Introducing Our Guest, Karen Weaver

5:12 - What Are University Presidents and Board Members Missing About College Sports?

6:38 - How is the Transfer Portal Impacting Graduation Rates?

8:26 - Do Athletics Align With College Mission Statements?

9:51 - What Washington Should Do to Regulate College Sports

11:50 - What If College Sports Lost Tax-Exempt Status?

13:23 - How Women’s Sports and Olympic Sports Fit In?

16:20 - Do NCAA Classifications Work Anymore?

20:22 - Who Defines Success for College Sports?

20:53 - Is Athletics Worth It As a ‘Front Porch’ of the College?

22:08 - How Should College Athletics Be Reformed?

25:36 - The Growth of Club Sports

29:18 - Do We Know the ROI of College Athletics?

34:00 - Getting Beyond Football and Basketball

37:05 - Connecting Athletics to Work-Integrated Learning

40:05 - Why Are People ‘All In’ on College Athletics

40:59 - How Injuries Play a Role

42:48 - The Connection Between Research and Athletic Prestige

45:07 - Is a Whole New Governance Structure Needed for Athletics?

46:05 - Lightning Round with Karen Weaver

Relevant Links:

“Four quick thoughts on the Protect College Sports Act: aka a college sports bill you should actually pay attention to,” by Matt Brown in his Extra Points newsletter.

“Sport Finance: Where the Money Comes From and Where the Money Goes,” by Karen Weaver.

“Trustees and Presidents: A Podcast for University Leaders,” by Karen Weaver

“Understanding College Athletics: What Campus Leaders Need to Know About College Sports,” by Karen Weaver

“The Future of Elite Youth Sports Is Here—and It’s a Mess,” in The Wall Street Journal.

“Range: Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World Range: Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World,” by David Epstein.

Closing down a college turns out to be a big job. For this episode, Jeff and Michael talk with a specialist on the complex and emotional process, Doug Moore. He shares all the things that college presidents and trustees should know—as well as surprising moments as he has helped colleges navigate finances, lawsuits, community impact, teach-outs, and more. And he explains why he sees signs of hundreds of college closures on the horizon.

Relevant Links

“The Looming College-Enrollment Death Spiral,” by Jeff Selingo in The Atlantic.

“History auctioned as Iowa Wesleyan closes its doors,” in Homegrown Iowan.

Chapters

0:00 - Intro

1:04 - The Surprising Complexity of Closing a College

3:00 - How a ‘College Closure’ Found that Profession

5:17 - How Do Colleges Find a Closer?

9:00 - Walking Through the Early Phases of Closing a Campus

14:53 - What Happens After the Final Graduation Ceremony?

18:55 - ‘Community Freebie Days’

22:33 - What’s The Most Surprising Thing a Closing Campus Had to Auction Off?

26:12 - Warning Signs That a College Might Fail

28:19 - Why College Sports Can Shutter Colleges

30:26 - 400 Colleges Could Fail in the Next 10 Years

32:11 - 20 or 30 Colleges Could Close This Year

33:18 - Why Don’t More Colleges Merge?

35:00 - Is Anyone Buying Closed Colleges?

38:33 - The Emotional Toll of Closing a College

42:06 - Sponsor Break

42:35 - Did Higher Ed Build Too Many Colleges?

49:28 - What Is Emotionally Lost When Colleges Disappear?

51:43 - What Will Happen to All These Closed Campus Facilities?

Connect with Michael Horn:

Sign Up for the The Future of Education Newsletter

Website

LinkedIn

X (Twitter)

Threads  

Connect with Jeff Selingo:

Dream School: Finding the College That's Right for You

Sign Up for the Next Newsletter

Website

X (Twitter)

Threads

LinkedIn

Connect with Future U:

Twitter

YouTube

Threads

Instagram

Facebook

LinkedIn  

Submit a question and if we answer it on air we'll send you Future U. swag!

Sign up for Future U. emails to get special updates and behind-the-scenes content.

Most public colleges get state funding based on “seat time,” — how many students are sitting through classes. Over a decade ago, leaders at Texas State Technical College bet on an experimental funding model that ties state support to the employment outcomes of their graduates. For this episode, we hear from the architect of the unusual approach, Michael Bettersworth, the college’s vice chancellor and chief marketing officer. And Jeff and Michael explore the lessons that all types of colleges can take from rethinking funding models to better match their missions. This episode is made with support from Ascendium Education Group.

Chapters

0:00 - Introduction

3:49 - A College That Only Gets Paid When Students Get Jobs

6:42 - How the Unusual Funding Model Started

9:49 - How Has the Funding Model Gone?

12:05 - Voters Approve Endowment for a Technical College

13:20 - A Quest to Better Map Skills Colleges Teach to Jobs

18:52 - The Importance of ‘Occupational Identity’

21:17 - Should Other Types of Colleges Try This Funding Model?

23:40 - How Much Should Colleges Be Responsible For Student Employment Outcomes?

25:43 - How Is AI Changing the Conversation About Skills?

29:01 - Creating Incentives to Map Teaching to Jobs

31:20 - How Can We Know What Skills Are Actually Needed in Certain Jobs?

34:41 - Funding Models Should Match College Missions

39:58 - Lightning Round with Michael Bettersworth

Relevant Links

“If—” by Rudyard Kipling

“Inventing a Job-Skills Machine,” by Rebecca Koenig in EdSurge

“Taxonomies of Human Performance,” by Edwin A. Fleishman.

“Marc Andreessen says AI layoffs are a farce: Companies are 75% overstaffed, and AI is the ‘silver bullet excuse’ to clean house,” in Fortune.