Review It Yourself

Was Sink the Bismarck! one of Britain's most accurate war films?

What happens when one of the most famous naval engagements of the Second World War becomes a 1960 British classic? In this episode of Review It Yourself, Sean dives into Sink the Bismarck! with returning guest Richard M. Jones, author, historian, researcher and lifelong enthusiast of shipwrecks and maritime history.

Rather than simply reviewing the film, this conversation explores why Sink the Bismarck! remains such an interesting and surprisingly restrained Second World War film. Richard brings his extensive knowledge of naval history to the discussion, examining what the film gets right, where Hollywood takes liberties, and why its portrayal of the Battle of the Denmark Strait and the hunt for the Bismarck still works more than six decades later.

At the heart of the discussion is the film's unusual approach. Instead of concentrating solely on spectacular battles and life aboard the warships, Sink the Bismarck! spends considerable time with the people making decisions behind the scenes. Kenneth More's fictional character, Commander Shepherd, becomes the centre of a story about leadership, pressure, responsibility and the human cost of warfare.

We also look at the film's portrayal of the HMS Hood, HMS Prince of Wales, Bismarck, Ark Royal and the wider British response to the German battleship's Atlantic sortie. The conversation considers the Battle of the Denmark Strait, the destruction of Hood, the eventual tracking and sinking of Bismarck, and the role of intelligence, reconnaissance and communications in the pursuit.

Richard explains why the film's historical accuracy makes it stand out, while also identifying some of its notable departures from reality — including the mysterious fictional ship Solent. We discuss how the real Bismarck story compares with its cinematic depiction and why the filmmakers' decision not to turn the ending into a simple moment of triumph actually gives the film much of its power.

The episode also takes us beneath the surface of the film and into Richard's own fascination with Bismarck. He explains how discovering Robert Ballard's Exploring the Bismarck as a young reader helped fuel his interest in the battleship, eventually leading to a lifelong passion for maritime history, shipwrecks, writing and research.

About Richard M. Jones
Richard M. Jones is an author, historian and researcher specialising in shipwrecks, shipping, military history and forgotten disasters. His interest in maritime history began at a young age and has developed into decades of research, writing, archive work and memorial campaigns.
Richard's official website features information about his books, research, talks and presentations, as well as his extensive shipwreck archive. He also offers talks for societies, schools and other groups.
Contact Richard:
Email: shipwreckdata@yahoo.co.uk
Richard M. Jones — official website
The website also provides a contact form and information for media, podcast, presentation and research enquiries.

Follow Review It Yourself
If you enjoy film reviews that go beyond the usual ratings and look at the history, context, accuracy and stories behind the films, make sure you follow Review It Yourself.
📸 Instagram: @reviewityourselfpodcast2021 on Instagram
🐦 X / Twitter: @YourselfReview on X / Twitter
🦋 BlueSky: Review It Yourself on BlueSky
🧵 Threads: @reviewityourselfpodcast2021 on Threads
📱 Cinova: @reviewityourself
📧 Email: reviewityourselfpodcast@gmail.com

Support Review It Yourself
If you've enjoyed this episode, the best way to support Review It Yourself is simple: listen, follow, subscribe, rate, review and share the podcast with someone who loves films, history or both.
Listen to the episode, revisit the film, and Review It Yourself.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

One of the most divisive vampire films finally gets a fair defence.

Is Queen of the Damned (2002) really one of the most unfairly criticised vampire films of the 2000s? In this special Defend It Yourself episode of Review It Yourself, host Sean is joined by co-host Sarah to make the case for the much-maligned adaptation of Anne Rice's vampire universe.

Rather than piling on the criticism, Sean and Sarah revisit Queen of the Damned with fresh eyes, discussing why its ambition, gothic style, unforgettable soundtrack and early-2000s aesthetic have earned it a loyal cult following. They explore how the film compares with other vampire favourites including Blade, The Crow and Interview with the Vampire, while examining why a film doesn't have to be perfect to be entertaining.

Expect a lively discussion covering the film's strengths, its flaws, Anne Rice's influence, vampire mythology, the performances, the rock-and-roll take on Lestat, and why taking creative risks sometimes makes for a far more memorable movie than playing it safe.

Whether you're a lifelong fan, a curious horror lover, or someone who dismissed Queen of the Damned years ago, this episode might just convince you to give it another chance.

In this episode:
Why Queen of the Damned deserves a second look
Sean and Sarah defend one of their favourite guilty pleasures
Comparing Queen of the Damned with Blade, The Crow and Interview with the Vampire
Anne Rice's vampire legacy and gothic storytelling
The film's iconic soundtrack and early-2000s style
Why ambitious films can be more enjoyable than "safe" ones
Cult movies, vampire cinema and horror nostalgia

If you enjoy honest film discussions without unnecessary waffle, subscribe to Review It Yourself, leave a rating on Apple Podcasts or Spotify, and share the episode with fellow film fans. Every review helps more listeners discover the show.

Follow Review It Yourself
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/reviewityourselfpodcast2021
X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/YourselfReview
BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/reviewityourself.bsky.social
Threads: https://www.threads.net/@reviewityourselfpodcast2021
Email: reviewityourselfpodcast@gmail.com

Support the Podcast
The best way to support Review It Yourself is to:
Subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.
Leave a 5-star rating and written review on Apple Podcasts.
Rate and comment on Spotify.
Share your favourite episodes on social media.
Recommend the podcast to friends who love films, horror and cult cinema.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Before the beast awakens, discover why this divisive horror remake deserves discussion.

Sean is joined by returning co-host Sarah for an in-depth review of The Wolfman Extended Cut (2010), starring Benicio del Toro, Anthony Hopkins, Emily Blunt and Hugo Weaving. While the film was heavily criticised on release and struggled at the box office, does the extended cut reveal an underrated Gothic horror, or is it still a missed opportunity?

The conversation explores the film's haunting Victorian atmosphere, practical effects, brutal werewolf action, performances, Gothic influences, emotional storytelling, and how it compares with both the classic Universal monster movies and other werewolf favourites such as An American Werewolf in London. Sean and Sarah don't entirely agree this time, leading to one of the podcast's most interesting debates as they examine what works, what doesn't, and whether this overlooked remake deserves another chance.
If you're a fan of The Wolfman (2010), werewolf films, Universal Monsters, Gothic horror, horror remakes, Benicio del Toro, Anthony Hopkins, or in-depth film review podcasts, this episode is for you.

In this episode:
The Wolfman Extended Cut (2010) review
Differences between the theatrical and extended versions
Benicio del Toro and Anthony Hopkins' performances
Gothic horror atmosphere and production design
Practical effects, CGI and werewolf transformations
Themes of family trauma, fate and the monster within
How it compares with classic Universal horror and modern werewolf films
Sean and Sarah's final verdicts

Follow Review It Yourself
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/reviewityourselfpodcast2021
X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/YourselfReview
BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/reviewityourself.bsky.social
Threads: https://www.threads.net/@reviewityourselfpodcast2021
Email: reviewityourselfpodcast@gmail.com

Support the podcast
If you enjoy Review It Yourself, please:
Follow or subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.
Leave a ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ rating on Apple Podcasts.
Rate and comment on Spotify.
Leave a review on Goodpods.
Share this episode with a fellow film fan—it's one of the best ways to help the podcast grow.

Review It Yourself – Film Reviews Without the Faff. Honest, entertaining and spoiler-filled discussions covering classic films, cult favourites, blockbusters and hidden gems.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Honour, sacrifice, and unforgettable battles—does The Last Samurai deserve modern masterpiece status?

Sean is joined by returning co-host Sarah to take a deep dive into The Last Samurai (2003), the sweeping historical epic directed by Edward Zwick and starring Tom Cruise, Ken Watanabe, and Timothy Spall. More than two decades after its release, does this ambitious blend of action, history, philosophy, and emotional storytelling still stand among the greatest historical dramas ever made?

From Hans Zimmer's soaring score and breath-taking cinematography to unforgettable performances and emotionally devastating moments, Sean and Sarah explore why The Last Samurai continues to inspire passionate debate. They discuss Tom Cruise's much-criticised casting, the film's portrayal of the samurai tradition, the balance between historical fact and Hollywood storytelling, and why Ken Watanabe's Oscar-nominated performance remains one of the film's greatest strengths.

Expect thoughtful analysis, plenty of laughs, spoiler-filled discussion, and a passionate defence of a film that many believe deserves far more recognition than it receives.

In this episode:

Is The Last Samurai one of Tom Cruise's finest performances?
Why Ken Watanabe steals nearly every scene.
The film's themes of honour, identity, redemption, and cultural change.
Hans Zimmer's unforgettable musical score.
Historical accuracy versus cinematic storytelling.
Favourite scenes, emotional moments, and standout performances.
Final ratings and whether this modern epic still holds up today.

If you enjoy in-depth movie reviews, film analysis, classic cinema discussions, and conversations about the biggest films in movie history, subscribe to Review It Yourself – Film Reviews Without the Faff for new episodes.

Follow Review It Yourself
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/reviewityourselfpodcast2021
X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/YourselfReview
BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/reviewityourself.bsky.social
Threads: https://www.threads.net/@reviewityourselfpodcast2021
Email: reviewityourselfpodcast@gmail.com

Support the podcast
If you enjoy the show, the best way to support Review It Yourself is to:

Follow or subscribe on your favourite podcast app.
Leave a 5-star rating and review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.
Share this episode with friends and fellow film fans.
Recommend a film you'd like Sean and the team to review in a future episode by getting in touch on social media or via email.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

We wanted to love Guillermo Del Toro's Frankenstein—here's why we didn't.

Guillermo Del Toro's Frankenstein (2025) has been one of the most anticipated horror films in years—but did it live up to the hype? Join Sean and Sarah as they dive deep into this bold adaptation of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, exploring its stunning visuals, performances, themes, and where they believe the film ultimately falls short.

Despite impressive production values, practical effects, and an emotionally compelling performance from the Creature, this adaptation left us wanting more. We discuss whether the film captures the heart of Shelley's novel, if Oscar Isaac's Victor Frankenstein works, how Jacob Elordi fares as the Creature, and why Guillermo Del Toro's storytelling choices may divide audiences.

Expect an honest, spoiler-filled conversation covering the film's pacing, adaptation choices, character motivations, body horror, gothic atmosphere, and whether this version deserves its growing reputation among horror fans.

In this episode:
Our spoiler review of Guillermo Del Toro's Frankenstein (2025)
How faithfully it adapts Mary Shelley's classic novel
Oscar Isaac's portrayal of Victor Frankenstein
Jacob Elordi's performance as the Creature
The film's visuals, practical effects and gothic horror aesthetic
Why we think the Creature's story is the strongest part of the film
The pacing, runtime and storytelling choices
Whether this adaptation improves upon classic Frankenstein films
Our final verdict and rating

Whether you're a lifelong fan of Frankenstein, a lover of gothic horror, or simply curious about Guillermo Del Toro's latest film, this episode offers an in-depth discussion packed with analysis, criticism, and appreciation for one of horror's most enduring stories.

If you enjoy the episode, please follow, subscribe, and leave a 5-star rating and review wherever you listen. It really helps more people discover Review It Yourself and supports the podcast.

Follow Review It Yourself
📸 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/reviewityourselfpodcast2021
🐦 X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/YourselfReview
🦋 BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/reviewityourself.bsky.social
🧵 Threads: https://www.threads.net/@reviewityourselfpodcast2021
📧 Email: reviewityourselfpodcast@gmail.com

Support the Podcast
The best way to support Review It Yourself is to:

Follow the podcast on your favourite podcast app.
Leave a rating and written review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.
Share this episode with fellow film and horror fans.
Join the conversation on social media and let us know your thoughts on Guillermo Del Toro's Frankenstein (2025).
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.