The Murder Book: A True Crime Podcast

Send us Fan Mail
The most chilling part of a murder trial isn’t always the verdict, it’s the moment a courtroom has to decide what a life is worth after the facts are already settled. We walk through the Von Stein murder sentencing hearing as Bart Upchurch’s fate comes down to a jury weighing aggravating factors against mitigation, with every witness shaping how “responsibility” is defined under the North Carolina death penalty.

We hear a former teacher describe Bart as bright, capable, and never aggressive, then watch the conversation veer into the era’s cultural lightning rod as Dungeons and Dragons gets pulled into court. A forensic psychologist adds another layer, reporting no psychosis, no brain damage, and no major mood disorder, while still explaining how denial and buried emotion can control someone’s inner life. The cross examination lands on the legal bottom line: he knew the difference between right and wrong.

Then the episode hits a moral fault line that true crime rarely captures so clearly: the victim, Bonnie Von Stein, says she does not want the defendant put to death, and the judge rules the jury cannot hear it. From there, closing arguments collide, with the prosecution urging jurors to act as the community’s conscience and the defense pressing age, drugs, alcohol, and fairness compared with Christopher Pritchard’s deal. We also follow the related sentencing proceedings for co defendants, including testimony about conscience, cooperation, mental health, addiction, and how fantasy escape can blur into real world catastrophe.

If you care about capital punishment, forensic psychology, and how courts shape narrative into sentence, listen now, then subscribe, share this episode, and leave a review. Where do you think justice lands when mercy is kept out of the record?
Support the show

Send us Fan Mail
The most dangerous part of a murder trial isn’t always the crime scene, it’s the moment a courtroom decides which story feels true. We’re near the end of the Von Stein family case, and everything narrows to closing arguments, jury instructions, and the crushing pause before the verdict forms come back. Bart Upchurch’s side argues the state’s 117 exhibits don’t physically connect him to the murders, and that the entire case depends on Chris Pritchard and Neil Henderson, two confessed participants who cut plea deals to avoid death row. 

We walk through the defense’s final push for reasonable doubt, from timeline questions raised by medical testimony to attacks on credibility and motive. Then the district attorney answers with a blunt theme: greed, instant gratification, and a conspiracy that explains the violence. One of the most unsettling courtroom moments arrives when a burned map is turned into a symbol, held up like a mask, and used to argue what the evidence “really” shows. 

After the speeches end, procedure takes over: the judge’s charge to the jury, the tense signals from deliberations, a jailhouse letter that can’t safely change the record, and finally the verdicts read aloud. If you follow true crime trials, North Carolina criminal justice, or how juries weigh cooperating witnesses, this chapter hits hard. Subscribe for the next installment, share this with a friend who loves courtroom breakdowns, and leave a review with your take: how much should uncorroborated testimony decide?
Support the show

Send us Fan Mail
Support the show

Send us Fan Mail
A death penalty case can pivot on one phone call, and that’s exactly where we start: Chris Pritchard decides to plead guilty and testify, and the fragile hope around Bart Upchurch’s defense instantly narrows. We walk through the private panic behind the scenes as Bart’s lawyers and parents confront the stakes in plain terms: a guilty plea might save his life, but it also means admitting to murder, and Bart refuses to do that.

From there, we move into Elizabeth City and the strange theater of trial. Jury selection, cameras in the courtroom, and Bart’s own posture in front of jurors all become part of the story. We break down the competing narratives from opening statements, including how Dungeons and Dragons is used to explain mindset and influence without claiming it “caused” the crime, and why the defense leans hard on the timing and incentives behind witness testimony.

Then the testimony lands with full force. Bonnie Von Stein describes the night of the attack, the long shadow it leaves on her body and mind, and the limits of what she could truly see. We also dig into the hard edges of evidence: investigators concede no physical proof places Bart in the house, and the medical examiner’s autopsy raises uncomfortable questions about injuries, digestion, and timeline. Finally, Chris Pritchard takes the stand and lays out a plot involving sleeping pills, a failed arson idea, maps, alibis, and promised payoffs, plus the chilling line that planning felt “like the game” until it became real.

Subscribe for more long form true crime storytelling, share this with a friend who follows North Carolina cases, and leave a review with your take: which testimony would you trust if you were on that jury?
Support the show

Send us Fan Mail
The case changes the moment the handcuffs go on, and it never stops changing after that. We pick up with Bart’s arrest and a quiet, rushed arraignment designed to keep the public from noticing, then watch that secrecy unravel as Chris is arrested at home and the town starts buzzing with leaks, reporters, and fear. With first-degree murder charges on the table and the death penalty looming, the early hours feel less like a clean search for truth and more like a race to control the story. 

From there, we track the legal machinery that decides what the public learns and when: grand jury indictments that help prosecutors avoid early hearings, discovery motions that reveal how little the defense can actually see, and bond hearings that separate who gets to go home from who stays behind bars. We also dig into the human side of the Von Stein family tragedy in Beaufort County, including the phone calls, breakdowns, and family fractures that erupt when someone is accused of murder and insists they were framed. 

Then the motive conversation lands like a thunderclap: news reports of a multimillion-dollar estate bring inheritance into the spotlight, while investigators and attorneys maneuver around witness statements, private detectives, and mounting media coverage. The pressure peaks with a plea bargain that turns Neil Henderson into the state’s key witness, complete with a rehearsal-style “trial before the trial,” and we end on a final development that reshapes everything heading into court. 

If you’re following the Von Stein murder case, true crime legal strategy, or how plea deals and public narratives collide, you’ll want every detail here. Subscribe, share this with a friend who loves court-room true crime, and leave a review with the question you can’t stop thinking about.
Support the show